90 Day Driving Prohibitions

Client 1 issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition by the police. A review was conducted before the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.

Vancouver Impaired Driving Lawyer: Brian E. Mickelson
Client was observed by police officer, asleep at the wheel of her vehicle in an intersection. The client had strong odour of liquor on her breath and exhibited substantial symptoms of Impairment by alcohol. Client charged with refusing a breath sample and having care and control of a motor vehicle while impaired.

Client 2 issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition by the police. A review was conducted before the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.

Vancouver Impaired Driving Lawyer: Brian E. Mickelson
Client pulled over after he is observed weaving in his lane and making an abnormally wide turn by the Langley RCMP. A demand for a breath sample is made at the detachment. Client refuses to blow unless he is permitted to have a cigarette beforehand.

Client 3 issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition by the Surrey R.C.M.P. A review was conducted by the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.

Vancouver Impaired Driving Lawyer: Brian E. Mickelson
Client found in the driver’s seat following a single vehicle accident. At the Surrey detachment, breath sample obtained indicating a blood/alcohol concentration well in excess of the legal limit.

Client 4 issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition by the police. A review was conducted before the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.

Vancouver Impaired Driving Lawyer: Brian E. Mickelson
Client pulled over by Vancouver Police. A demand for a roadside breath sample was made. Client blew, and was issued a Notice of 90-Day Driving Prohibition on the basis that the concentration of alcohol in his blood exceeded 80 milligrams in 100 millilitres of blood within 3 hours after operating or having care or control of a motor vehicle.

Client 5 issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition by the police. A review was conducted before the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.

Vancouver Impaired Driving Lawyer: Brian E. Mickelson
Langley RCMP responded to a motor vehicle accident that had just occurred. The Ambulance Paramedic on scene stated to the officer on scene that the client driver “appeared” to be impaired.

Client 6 issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition by the police. A review was conducted before the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.

Vancouver Impaired Driving Lawyer: Brian E. Mickelson
Police witness client swerving and driving slowly, and must box him in to stop his vehicle. Breath samples are obtained well in excess of the legal limit.

Client 7 issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition by the police.

Vancouver Impaired Driving Lawyer: Brian E. Mickelson
Client found by police asleep in his vehicle. A demand for a breath sample is made. Client refuses to blow.

Client 8 issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition by the police. A review was conducted before the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.

Vancouver Impaired Driving Lawyer: Brian E. Mickelson
Police responded to a motor vehicle collision. While waiting for EMS to arrive, Officers on scene noted an odour of liquor emanating for the client’s breath.

Client 9 issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition by the police. A review was conducted before the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.

Vancouver Impaired Driving Lawyer: Brian E. Mickelson
Client was issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition on the basis that the client failed or refused to comply with a demand for a breath sample without having a reasonable excuse for that refusal.

Client 10 issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition by the police. A review was conducted before the Superintendent of Motor Vehicles.

Vancouver Impaired Driving Lawyer: Brian E. Mickelson
Client was issued a Notice of Driving Prohibition on the basis that the concentration of alcohol in his blood exceeded 80 milligrams in 100 millilitres of blood within 3 hours after operating or having care or control of a motor vehicle.