Immediate Roadside Prohibition Cases

There was a report to the police about a motor vehicle accident. The witness observed the driver in the driver’s seat, with their seat belt on and with the keys in the ignition. The driver admitted to the police that they were driving when they lost control of the vehicle and it went into the ditch. The driver blew for “fail” readings. The driver was issued a 90 day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.

The police officer stated that he saw the accused drive and park the vehicle in the driveway. The accused denied that they were driving and that the officer witnessed any driving as the officer did not arrive on scene until after the vehicle was parked. The accused provided one “Fail” reading. The driver was issued a 90 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.

The driver was stopped by the police for speeding. The officer noted an overwhelming odour or mouthwash. The driver denied consuming any alcohol. The officer demanded the driver provide a sample of breath. The driver provided two “Warn” readings. The driver was issued a 3 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.

The driver was observed by police to be swerving and speeding down the road. The officer attempted to stop the suspect vehicle unsuccessfully. The officer followed the suspect vehicle home. The officer noted the driver was staggering and had a strong odour of alcohol. The officer made a breath demand into an Approved Screening Device (ASD) on the driver’s property. The driver refused to provide a breath sample to police. The driver was issued a 90 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.

The driver was stopped at a road block. The officer noted a strong odour of alcohol on the driver and the driver was unsteady on his feet. The officer made a breath demand. The driver provided two “Fail” readings. The devices were calibrated properly and were not expired. The driver was issued a 90 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.

The driver was observed speeding by the police. The officer failed to include in his report that he had temporarily lost visual contact of the driver when the driver returned into an establishment to retrieve their driver’s license. The office noted an odour of alcohol and breath and the driver admitted to consuming alcohol. The officer made a breath demand into an Approved Screening Device. The driver provided two “Fail” readings. The driver was issued a 90 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.

The driver was stopped at a roadblock. The officer noted a strong odour of alcohol on the breath of the driver, that the driver had very glassy and watery eyes, and that the driver was unsteady on feet. The driver provided two “Fail” readings. The driver was issued a 90 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.

Police received a complaint about a driver swerving on the road. Police respond to the complaint. The driver had a strong odour of alcohol, slurred speech and was unsteady on the feet. The driver did not admit to drinking. The officer demanded a breath sample from the driver. The driver refused to provide a breath sample. The driver was issued a 90 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.

Police were called to the scene regarding a suspected impaired driver. The driver was found outside of their vehicle when the police arrived. A witness identified the driver as the driver of the vehicle. A strong odour of alcohol was detected on the driver. A breath demand is made and the driver refused to provide a breath sample. The driver was issued a 90 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.

Police responded to the scene of a two vehicle accident. The driver parked the damaged vehicle away from the scene of the accident to clear the road. The driver was found outside of their vehicle at the scene of the accident. Visual continuity of the driver was not maintained by any witnesses or an officer. The driver was issued a 90 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.

A police complaint about suspected impaired driver led police to the scene. The driver was found sitting in the front passenger seat of the vehicle with the engine running. An odour of alcohol is detected and the driver admits to the recent consumption of alcohol. The officer demanded a breath sample. The driver provided two “Fail” readings. The driver was issued a 90 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.

The driver was stopped at a roadblock. The officer noted an odour of alcohol and the driver admitted to consuming alcohol. The officer made a breath demand to the driver. The driver provided 7 breath samples but only one of the samples was suitable and registered a “Fail”. The driver was issued a 90 Day Immediate Roadside Prohibition.